Science Atlas

How We Know What We Know
Concepts

Peer Review

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Peer review is the practice of having independent experts in a field examine a claimed finding before it is published, checking its method and reasoning rather than taking the author's word for it. Its earliest institutional home is the Royal Society's journal Philosophical Transactions, begun in 1665, which had its Council review submissions before printing them, though single-blind and double-blind review by named external referees in the modern sense developed gradually over the eighteenth through twentieth centuries rather than arriving fully formed. It remains contested: reviewers disagree, bias by reviewer prestige or institution is documented, and it has repeatedly failed to catch fraud, but no replacement mechanism commands comparable trust across the sciences.

Facts
Proposed Year
1665 1
The founding year of Philosophical Transactions, the earliest journal credited with institutionalising external review before publication; the practice itself developed gradually rather than starting fully formed on this date.
Proposed By
Henry Oldenburg 2
Cross-Tradition Connections

Proposed By

Philosophical Transactions, begun by the Royal Society in 1665, is the earliest journal credited with institutionalising review before publication.

Studied In

Sources
1. Peer Review (Britannica)
Encyclopaedia BritannicaView the Source
2. Peer Review (Wikipedia)
WikipediaHistory section
Quote, History section
Henry Oldenburg (1619-1677) was a German-born British philosopher who is seen as the father of modern scientific peer review.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.