Science Atlas

How We Know What We Know
Scientists

Imre Lakatos

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Imre Lakatos was a Hungarian-born philosopher of mathematics and science, born in Debrecen in 1922 and died in London in 1974. He fled Hungary in 1956 after the Soviet suppression of the Hungarian Uprising and settled in Britain, where he taught at the London School of Economics alongside, and eventually succeeded, Karl Popper. His Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes reframes Popper's falsifiability criterion: rather than a single theory being falsified and discarded by one bad result, Lakatos argued science actually proceeds through research programmes, a protected core of assumptions surrounded by auxiliary hypotheses that absorb anomalies, and a programme is judged progressive or degenerating by whether it keeps predicting genuinely new facts or only patches itself to survive old ones. Whether this rescues Popper's demarcation project or quietly concedes its central claim, that a clean falsifying test exists at all, remains argued in the philosophy of science literature; Lakatos himself presented it as a refinement, not a rejection, of falsifiability.

Whether the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes rescues Popperian falsificationism or effectively abandons its central claim, since a research programme's protective belt can absorb almost any anomaly, is argued between Lakatos's own defenders and critics including Feyerabend, and is not settled by this atlas.
Facts
Birth Year
1922 1
Field
Philosophy of science and mathematics 1
Cross-Tradition Connections

Critiqued

Lakatos's Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes revises rather than rejects Popper's falsifiability criterion, arguing that a single theory is rarely tested and discarded in isolation, science instead proceeding through research programmes judged progressive or degenerating over time.

Proposed

Works In

Sources
1. Imre Lakatos (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2016SEP, first pub. 2016
Quote, SEP, first pub. 2016
A research programme is progressive if it is both theoretically and empirically progressive, and degenerating if it is not.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.