Science Atlas

How We Know What We Know
Theories

Electron-Pair Bond Theory

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The electron-pair bond theory holds that a covalent chemical bond forms when two atoms share a pair of electrons between them, each atom typically contributing one electron to the shared pair. Gilbert N. Lewis proposed it in his 1916 paper "The Atom and the Molecule," together with a way of drawing it, now called Lewis structures or Lewis dot diagrams, in which dots around an atomic symbol represent its valence electrons and a shared pair is drawn between bonded atoms. The theory explained why atoms combine in the fixed small-number ratios Dalton's atomic theory had described without explaining, continuing the refinement chain Ernest Rutherford's 1911 discovery of atomic structure began on that entity. Linus Pauling, in The Nature of the Chemical Bond (1939), extended Lewis's picture with the new quantum mechanics, introducing orbital hybridization and resonance to explain bond geometry and strength in more complex molecules, work still built on Lewis's shared electron pair as its basic unit. Irving Langmuir independently extended and popularized the theory during the 1920s and won the 1932 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for that work; Lewis himself, despite originating the idea, was nominated repeatedly but never won a Nobel Prize.

Facts
Proposed Year
1916 1
Proposed By
Gilbert N. Lewis 1
Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs To

Chemistry, Disciplines

Critiqued By

Pauling's The Nature of the Chemical Bond (1939) extends Lewis's 1916 shared electron pair with the new quantum mechanics: orbital hybridization to explain bond geometry, resonance to explain molecules no single Lewis structure captures, and a numerical electronegativity scale to predict how bonds are shared unevenly between different elements. The shared electron pair itself, Lewis's basic unit, is unchanged; Pauling supplies the quantum-mechanical machinery underneath it.

Proposed By

Sources
1. Gilbert N. Lewis (Britannica)
Encyclopaedia Britannica
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.